Cyber Month Sale - Up To 40% OFF

7 Best Ethereum RPC Providers [2026]

7 Best Ethereum RPC Providers [2026]
Published on Dec 22, 2025 Updated on Dec 22, 2025

Building anything on Ethereum, from decentralized Applications (dApps) to Decentralized Finance (DeFi) wallets, starts with reliable access to the network. The best Ethereum RPC providers are the backbone that enables fast, secure, and scalable connections.

In this article, we’ll explore the seven best Ethereum RPC providers, which Web3 developers, dApps, and wallets can use to interact with the Ethereum blockchain.

#What is an RPC node?

An RPC (Remote Procedure Call) node is a server connected to a blockchain network such as Ethereum or Solana.

It enables users to interact with the blockchain without running their own copy. Think of it like this: if the blockchain were a massive library of records, an RPC node would be the librarian who fetches the book (data) you ask for and can also help you write a new record in the book.

Set up your Ethereum server in minutes

Run your Ethereum nodes on dedicated bare metal — cost efficient, high performance, with full control. Optimized for RPC providers and Web3 developers.

#What is an Ethereum RPC node?

An Ethereum RPC provider is a service that acts as a gateway to the Ethereum blockchain, allowing users to handle requests such as checking balances, sending transactions, or querying smart contracts. RPC nodes can be either public or private endpoints.

#Private vs public Ethereum RPC endpoints

Public Ethereum RPC endpoints are free, shared access points provided by projects or communities. They are ideal for testing or light use, but are often limited by speed, rate caps, or reliability.

On the other hand, private Ethereum RPC endpoints are paid or dedicated services that offer faster performance, higher uptime, stronger security, and custom scalability for production-grade applications. Key factors to consider when choosing an RPC provider include latency, uptime, and scalability to handle user growth.

#Best Ethereum RPC for Developers in Web3: 7 Providers

We considered key factors, including support for the Ethereum mainnet, testnets, and layer 2s. Here are the nine best Ethereum RPC providers:

#Infura - Most reliable for Ethereum

Reviews: 4.3 / 5.0 on G2

Overview: Infura is a Web3 infrastructure platform run by ConsenSys. It provides access to API and node services for blockchains such as Ethereum, so developers don’t have to run full nodes themselves.

The provider supports rapid integration with decentralized applications (dApps) and offers scalable access to blockchain networks with managed infrastructure and developer tooling. For teams building on Ethereum or Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chains, Infura is a trusted provider to avoid the complexity of self-hosting node infrastructure.

Key features:

  • High availability, managed infrastructure: Infura handles the node infrastructure, network updates, syncing, and scaling, so you don’t have to manage your own complete Ethereum node pool.
  • Multi-network support and archive access: Beyond the Ethereum mainnet and testnets, Infura supports additional networks, including major layer-2 (L2) networks. It also provides archive data to facilitate analytics and historical queries.
  • Developer-friendly API suite: It’s easy to onboard: you simply create a project, get API keys, use endpoints, and get started fast. The provider offers comprehensive Software Development Kits (SDKs), detailed documentation, and robust tooling.
  • Credit-based pricing model and scaling tiers: Infura uses a credit-based system in which each RPC/API call consumes credits based on complexity. This allows teams to scale as their usage grows, with clear tiered plans.

Best use cases:

  • dApp/back-end services on Ethereum: Infura is a strong fit if you’re building a wallet, DeFi interface, NFT app, or any front-end that needs to query Ethereum and you don’t want to manage your own nodes. For example, the team behind Uniswap uses Infura for data requests.
  • Startups or MVPs with moderate traffic: Because of the free tier and managed infrastructure, early developers can focus on the product rather than infrastructure.
  • Enterprise applications requiring reliability and archival data: Infura is ideal for projects that need archive access or infrastructure with uptime and enterprise-grade support.

Pros:

  • Proven and trusted infrastructure with many developers and projects already using it
  • Managed service that removes the overhead of running Ethereum nodes, including syncing, updates, and scaling.
  • It’s a developer-friendly platform with a straightforward API, documentation, SDKs, and support for multiple networks.
  • It offers a flexible pricing model, ranging from free to enterprise tiers, with credit-based usage, allowing developers to scale up as needed.

Cons:

  • Infura puts rates or throughput limits on lower tiers. Users may reach their caps or require a higher plan for high-volume or bursty traffic.
  • There’s less control due to dependence on a third-party provider. This may result in a “single point of failure” if the provider experiences an outage.
  • The cost may be higher for large analytics workloads compared to more specialized or less expensive providers.

#Alchemy - Best developer tools & APIs

Reviews: 4.4 / 5.0 on G2

Overview: Often described as “AWS for Web3,” Alchemy offers node access, APIs, and developer tooling across various blockchains, including Ethereum and EVM-compatible chains. It’s widely used by dApp teams who want to focus on their product rather than run their own nodes.

Key features:

  • Alchemy has a developer-friendly API suite with enhanced capabilities across many networks.
  • Free tier with a substantial allocation, including 30 million Compute Units per month for initial usage.
  • Multi-network support, including Ethereum, major layer-2s, and other EVM chains.
  • Scalability and enterprise onboarding enable projects to scale with high throughput and provide access to archives for advanced use cases.

Best use cases:

  • Alchemy is best for dApp development and launch, such as wallets and NFT platforms, where users may want managed infrastructure without running their own nodes.
  • It’s also ideal for analytics and tooling on the Ethereum blockchain and EVM chains that require archive data, tracing, and advanced features.
  • The provider suits startups or smaller teams that require a robust free tier to bootstrap and then scale with a pay-as-you-go model.

Pros:

  • Alchemy offers powerful developer tooling and a feature set.
  • It offers a generous free tier for early usage.
  • The provider has a broad network of support and is trusted by many projects.

Cons:

  • Heavy usage can be expensive.
  • Method-weight or compute-unit billing can make cost prediction more difficult than with flat-free models.

High egress costs and lost transactions?

Switch to blockchain-optimized dedicated bare metal—save up to 60% on your cloud bill and double the performance compared to hyperscale cloud.

#Chainstack - Best enterprise flexibility

Reviews: 4.7 / 5.0 on Trustpilot

Overview: Chainstack is a managed blockchain infrastructure provider offering node/RPC solutions across many networks. It focuses on simplicity, scalability, and predictable pricing. They cater to enterprise and high-volume users who want reliability and global node distribution without the complexity of self-hosting.

Key features:

  • Multi-chain support with over 70 chains, including Ethereum and EVM networks.
  • Transparent and predictable pricing with the Request Unit (RU) billing model that simplifies usage costing and has fewer hidden multipliers.
  • A strong user interface and support offering a fast setup.

Best use cases:

  • Chainstack supports teams and projects building across multiple chains that require high throughput, predictable costs, and global node infrastructure.
  • It also supports enterprises or larger dApps where cost predictability and infrastructure reliability are more important than just a “free tier.”
  • The provider is well-suited for analytics, indexers, or apps with heavy historical or archive usage, where usage volume and cost scalability are essential.

Pros:

  • The provider has a good balance of price versus features, with easy setup and reliability.
  • It has a predictable pricing model and transparent billing.
  • Chainstack offers multi-chain support and enterprise-grade infrastructure.

Cons:

  • The free tier may have lower throughput than the full enterprise tiers.
  • It may lack some advanced, niche-specific features, such as Alchemy’s deep debugging or tracing.

#GetBlock - Affordabile, Production-Ready Ethereum RPC

Reviews: 3.7 / 5 on G2

Overview: GetBlock is a leading Web3 infrastructure provider. It offers instant API access to full nodes and RPC endpoints across over 50 blockchain protocols, including Ethereum mainnet and testnets. Their platform targets developers and teams building dApps, wallets, analytics tools, or other blockchain-connected systems.

Key features:

  • Multi-chain and multi-protocol support: GetBlock supports Ethereum and many other chains (L1s and L2s) under one roof, making it easier for projects that work on multiple chains.
  • Flexible access methods: The platform supports JSON-RPC, REST, WebSocket, and GraphQL, allowing developers to choose how to access node data and interact with the chain.
  • Shared, dedicated, and custom infrastructure tiers:** Users can start with a shared node at a lower cost and scale up to dedicated nodes or custom clusters as demand grows.
  • Dashboard monitoring and analytics: The provider offers user-friendly dashboards to track API requests, methods used, and node performance. This helps developers gain visibility into usage and health.

Best use cases:

  • dApp development and prototyping: For developers building on Ethereum or multi-chain networks, the free tier and multi-protocol support let them test and iterate without a heavy infrastructure investment.
  • Wallets, NFTs, and DeFi applications: GetBlock supports projects that require real-time access to chain data — such as balances, transactions, and contract state — enabling them to benefit from node endpoints and various access methods.
  • Analytics, tracking, and cross-chain tooling: GetBlock covers many chains and provides dashboard analytics, enabling teams building cross-chain dashboards or monitoring tools to unify infrastructure.

Pros:

  • GetBlock has broad chain support, including not only Ethereum but also other protocols.
  • Flexible access with various protocols and scaling options.
  • Low-cost entry with a free tier allowing small developers and hobbyists to get started with no upfront cost.
  • A rich dashboard and monitoring tools make it easy to track usage and performance.

Cons:

  • There are reliability concerns, with some users reporting downtime or node instability.
  • The provider has mixed customer reviews, with some users reporting a poor experience.

#Validation Cloud - Best for enterprise-grade performance

Reviews: 4.8 / 5.0 on G2

Overview: Validation Cloud offers high-performance global RPC/Node API services across many blockchain networks. The provider emphasizes low latency, international distribution, and enterprise-grade compliance (SOC2). The platform is built for developers and institutions that need fast, reliable access to blockchains and scalable Compute-Unit (CU) billing.

Key features:

  • Global delivery network with multi-region nodes enabling low-latency access from North America, Europe, and Asia.
  • The free tier offers up to 50 million CUs per month, with pay-as-you-go pricing beyond that.
  • Enterprise-grade compliance and uptime guarantee.
  • Broad chain and protocol support, including Ethereum and other chains.

Best use cases:

  • Validation Cloud supports high-performance dApps, trading, and financial applications, where latency and throughput are crucial.
  • It’s suitable for multi-chain infrastructure or projects that need a global footprint and enterprise reliability.
  • It suits projects that value compliance and security, such as institutional Web3 projects, that want flexible, usage-based billing.

Pros:

  • Robust performance metrics and global distribution.
  • Free, generous tier for starters.
  • Enterprise-grade reliability and performance.
  • Flexible, pay-as-you-go scaling.

Cons:

  • Some advanced features or chain-specific support may require more setup or technical expertise.
  • Ultra-large volumes may require custom pricing.

#QuickNode - Fastest response times

Reviews: 4.4 / 5.0 on G2

Overview: QuickNode is a multi-chain blockchain infrastructure provider offering RPC endpoints, analytics, archive data, NFT APIs, and more across several blockchains, including Ethereum. It emphasizes speed, reliability, and developer tools, positioning itself to serve both smaller developers and enterprise-scale teams.

Key features:

  • Broad support for many chains and networks with full archive, testnet, and production support.
  • Flexible access methods and developer tooling.
  • Transparent pricing tiers, including a free plan and paid scaling

Best use cases:

  • QuickNode is suitable for developers building dApps, wallets, or NFT platforms that span multiple chains and need fast API access.
  • It works well for teams requiring archive data, historical blockchain queries, and trace/debug support beyond basic endpoint calls.
  • It suits projects that require a reliable, performance-oriented infrastructure with scalability potential.

Pros:

  • Powerful performance and uptime metrics.
  • Broad chain support and developer-friendly tooling.
  • It offers a reliable free entry option and scalable paid tiers.

Cons:

  • Cost may increase significantly for high volume and extra-large usage.
  • The free tier may be limited in throughput for production use.

#NodeReal - Best budget-friendly starter

Reviews: 4.8 / 5.0 on G2

Overview: NodeReal positions itself as a “one-stop blockchain infrastructure provider.” It offers RPC endpoints, custom application chains, layer-2, and scaling infrastructure. NodeReal supports major blockchains, including Ethereum.

Key features:

  • Instant RPC endpoints for multiple chains and testnets, including RESTful APIs for complex use cases.
  • A free plan is available for starters, with tiered pricing for growth.
  • It supports a build-your-own custom application chain, layer-2 solutions, and full-stack infrastructure beyond just RPC.

Best use cases:

  • NodeReal is best suited for independent developers and small teams building dApps who need affordable access to RPC endpoints and multi-chain support.
  • It favors projects that may extend into custom app chains or layer-2 solutions, not just standard RPC.
  • It works for startups that require infrastructure beyond just endpoints, such as API services and custom chains, all under one roof.

Pros:

  • There is an affordable entry point and a free tier for smaller developers.
  • It offers broad chain, layer-2, and custom chain support.
  • It’s suitable for developers who want a unified provider for RPC and infrastructure scaling.

Cons:

  • The free tier may have limitations for production workloads and may require upgrading early for higher throughput.
  • Uptime and performance claims are less prominently benchmarked than those of competitors.

#Comparison table of Ethereum RPC providers

Category Best Provider Why
Most reliable for Ethereum Infura Backed by ConsenSys, industry-standard uptime
Best developer tools & APIs Alchemy Advanced APIs, analytics, and performance
Best enterprise flexibility Chainstack Supports private/hybrid nodes and custom infrastructure
Best budget-friendly starter NodeReal / GetBlock Free tiers and affordable scaling options
Best for enterprise-grade performance Validation Cloud Global infrastructure with SOC2 compliance
Fastest response times QuickNode Consistent, speedier performance benchmarked

#Final thoughts: Picking the right RPC provider

Choosing the right Ethereum RPC provider depends on your project’s scale, performance needs, and budget. Whether you’re building a high-traffic DeFi platform, an NFT marketplace, or testing dApps, this list has reliable options.

Some providers, such as Validation Cloud, work with Cherry Servers to provide their underlying infrastructure. However, before choosing a provider, you should evaluate uptime, scalability, and developer tools to ensure your blockchain infrastructure grows seamlessly with your vision.

Blockchain Servers – Built for Web3

Deploy secure and high-performance nodes on dedicated infrastructure.

Share this article

Related Articles

Published on Dec 23, 2025 Updated on Dec 23, 2025

7 High-Performance RPC Node Providers [2026]

This guide compares seven high-performance RPC node providers for different Web3 projects to help your application stay fast, stable, and production-ready.

Read More
Published on Dec 23, 2025 Updated on Dec 23, 2025

How to Deploy a Solana Firedancer Validator [Step-by-Step]

This tutorial shows how to deploy a Solana Firedancer validator. We define the exact steps to deploy a Frankendancer testnet and confirm it is working properly.

Read More
Published on Dec 23, 2025 Updated on Dec 23, 2025

What is a Node Operator & How to Become One

This guide defines what is a node operator and how to become one. We also highlight typical requirements like hardware, operations, and stake for active participation.

Read More
We use cookies to ensure seamless user experience for our website. Required cookies - technical, functional and analytical - are set automatically. Please accept the use of targeted cookies to ensure the best marketing experience for your user journey. You may revoke your consent at any time through our Cookie Policy.
build: 2daba3cef.1554