10 Web3 Infrastructure Providers

The Web3 market is forecast to grow from $6.75 billion in 2026 to $116.55 billion by 2035, at a 38% compound annual growth rate, according to Precedence Research. Most of that growth will run on validators, RPC nodes, and managed APIs.

This guide covers the 10 Web3 infrastructure providers worth considering. We'll walk through what each provider offers, the chains they support, and the trade-offs to weigh before signing up.

#What is Web3?

Web3 is a decentralized version of the internet powered by blockchain technology. Unlike Web2, where platforms control user data and digital interactions, Web3 enables user-owned data, digital assets, and peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries. Web3 runs on cryptocurrencies, smart contracts, and decentralized applications (dApps).

#What is Web3 infrastructure?

Web3 infrastructure is the technical foundation that enables decentralized applications and services to operate on blockchain networks. It spans the protocols, storage layers, and node services that move data and value across the chain without a central operator in the middle.

Key types and components of Web3 infrastructure include:

Blockchain networks: Decentralized ledgers for transactions and smart contracts. Layer 1 chains like Ethereum and Solana run their own consensus, while Layer 2 chains like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base sit on top of Layer 1s for cheaper, faster transactions.

Decentralized storage: Offers secure data storage across distributed nodes. Examples include Filecoin (for peer-to-peer storage), Arweave (for permanent storage), and IPFS (for peer-to-peer file sharing).

Data indexing and oracles: Organize blockchain data and bridge offchain information. Examples include indexers like The Graph (a blockchain search engine), oracles like Chainlink (for real-world data feeds), and DIA Data (for customizable data feeds).

#What to look for in a Web3 infrastructure provider

Regular hosting won't work for Web3 infrastructure because node operators have specific requirements that normal web servers rarely encounter.

• Bare metal power: Virtualization can impact node performance when validating thousands of transactions. You need dedicated AMD EPYC or Intel Xeon chips running at full speed without a hypervisor eating resources, which is why bare metal is the standard choice for Web3 workloads.

• Chain variety: Ethereum isn't the only game anymore. Providers should support Solana, Polygon, and other major networks with proper documentation that actually explains the setup process.

• Crypto payments: Bitcoin and stablecoin payments make sense here since you're already in the crypto space. Some providers skip the KYC process for crypto customers who value privacy.

• Network capacity: Nodes constantly sync with their peers worldwide. You'll easily burn through 100TB of monthly bandwidth, and low latency to other nodes keeps you from falling behind the chain.

• API control: Manual node management is painful when you're running multiple chains. REST APIs and Terraform support enable you to automate everything, which is no longer optional for serious operators.

#10 Popular Web3 infrastructure providers

Here are 10 Web3 infrastructure providers worth considering, each evaluated against the criteria above. The list spans managed RPC services, institutional staking platforms, and bare metal hosts for self-run nodes.

#1. Cherry Servers

Cherry Servers provides bare metal infrastructure for Web3 workloads, with a particular focus on Solana validators and RPC nodes. Pre-configured nodes run on 5th-generation AMD EPYC hardware with up to 10 Gbps uplinks and 100 TB of included egress.

Validators in Cherry’s EU regions can cross-connect directly into the DoubleZero high-performance network rather than tunneling over the public internet. Billing supports payment in BTC, ETH, SOL, and other cryptocurrencies.

Pros

• Live DoubleZero integration in EU regions, with in-rack cross-connects for Solana validators
• Pre-configured Solana validator and RPC nodes on 5th-gen AMD EPYC hardware
• Crypto-native billing in BTC, ETH, SOL, and stablecoins

Cons

• DoubleZero connectivity limited to EU regions
• Self-managed: you rent the hardware and run the node software yourself

Best for

Web3 teams who want to self-host validators and RPC nodes on bare metal with crypto-native billing, especially Solana operators in EU regions who can use DoubleZero cross-connects.

#2. Helius

Helius offers Solana-native infrastructure for teams building on Solana, delivering managed RPC, APIs, transaction-landing, and gRPC streaming. Helius operates a Solana validator directly, which powers staked connections through Sender for higher transaction landing rates.

LaserStream offers Yellowstone-compatible gRPC streaming. The service includes historical replay and automatic regional failover. Customers include Phantom, Jupiter, and Coinbase.

Pros

• Sender delivers higher transaction landing rates, and LaserStream provides Yellowstone-compatible gRPC streaming
• Photon is the canonical Solana ZK-compression indexer, used alongside the DAS API
• Powers Bitwise's BSOL as the exclusive Solana staking and infrastructure provider

Cons

• Solana-only, with no native multi-chain offering for EVM, Bitcoin, or Cosmos
• Premium capabilities like LaserStream and Shred Delivery are tier-gated to higher plans

Best for

Solana-only teams building wallets, DEXs, or trading apps that need reliable transaction landing and gRPC streaming without operating their own nodes.

#3. QuickNode

QuickNode provides managed multi-chain RPC and Web3 services across 82+ chains and 135+ networks, including Solana, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Hyperliquid. Developers access RPC, data APIs, indexing, and AI agent tooling under a single account, without managing separate provider relationships per chain.

Pros

• Offers dedicated nodes, archive nodes, and trader-grade endpoints for high-throughput workloads
• Adds support for new chains quickly, including MegaETH, Robinhood Chain, and Hyperliquid
• Infrastructure spans 14+ regions across multiple cloud providers, reducing single-cloud failure risk

Cons

• Multi-chain coverage trades chain-specific depth for breadth
• Steep learning curve for first-time users without prior RPC experience

Best for

Multi-chain dev teams who want one managed RPC provider covering Solana, EVM networks, and emerging chains under a single account.

#4. Alchemy

Alchemy powers Web3 infrastructure for Robinhood, Coinbase, Visa, and Stripe across 100+ chains. The platform extends beyond RPC to include Smart Wallets, Rollup-as-a-Service, Data APIs, and Subgraphs, giving teams one vendor for the full stack from contract deployment to user onboarding. The 2025 acquisition of DexterLab added archival and real-time Solana data.

Pros

• Smart Wallets stack handles user onboarding without requiring crypto wallets or gas tokens
• Rollup-as-a-Service supports custom L2s on Arbitrum Orbit and OP Stack with managed infrastructure
• Sub-50ms RPC response times with automatic regional failover

Cons

• Older docs and guides still reference Supernode, which can confuse new users
• Migrating off Smart Wallets or Rollup-as-a-Service requires significant rework

Best for

Consumer Web3 and fintech teams who need wallet-free user onboarding or want to launch their own L2.

#5. Infura (Consensys)

Infura provides managed RPC and Web3 services from Consensys, the company behind MetaMask and Linea. The platform supports Ethereum, Linea, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Starknet, among other networks.

In 2025, Infura launched DIN (Decentralized Infrastructure Network), which runs as an EigenLayer service to add cryptoeconomic guarantees through ETH restaking.

Pros

• Integrates natively with MetaMask and Linea
• Provides RPC reliability backed by EigenLayer slashing through DIN
• Connects to the wider Consensys stack, including Diligence, Truffle, and MetaMask SDK

Cons

• No native Solana RPC; limited access only via MetaMask Developer
• IPFS service is restricted; new keys are no longer available to most customers

Best for

EVM teams building on Linea or shipping to MetaMask users who want managed RPC tied to the Consensys ecosystem.

#6. Chainstack

Chainstack offers multi-chain managed RPC for trading and high-frequency workloads. They support 70+ protocols, including Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Hyperliquid.

Chainstack’s Trader Node ships with bloXroute integration and Warp Transactions for low-latency mempool routing. The platform includes MEV protection across major chains. Solana coverage uses the Yellowstone gRPC Geyser plugin for streaming onchain data.

Pros

• Built-in MEV protection on EVM chains shields trades from front-running without requiring custom RPC configuration
• Flat-rate node options remove per-request billing surprises for predictable workloads
• Global Node delivers elastic auto-scaling for variable traffic, with dedicated nodes available for steady-load workloads

Cons

• No native Solana indexing or transaction-landing services
• Missing application-layer products like Smart Wallets or rollup-as-a-service

Best for

Trading bots, MEV searchers, and high-frequency teams who need multi-chain managed RPC with private mempool routing and built-in MEV protection.

#7. Ankr

Ankr offers multi-chain RPC across 80+ networks, run by a decentralized node network of independent operators across 30+ regions. The platform supports Rollup-as-a-Service deployments on Polygon CDK, OP Stack, ZK Stack, and Fluent. Premium gRPC streaming supports real-time on-chain data feeds for trading and indexing workloads.

Pros

• Decentralized node network runs across 30+ regions
• Deploys AppChains for custom L1s and Rollup-as-a-Service for L2s
• Premium RPC traffic runs over Asphere's dedicated private fiber instead of the public internet

Cons

• Some premium features require holding ANKR tokens, which doesn’t suit teams avoiding token exposure
• Public RPCs are rate-limited and not suitable for production workloads at scale

Best for

Teams launching their own L1 or L2 who want a managed multi-chain RPC backed by a decentralized node network.

#8. Blockdaemon

Blockdaemon delivers institutional Web3 infrastructure for banks, exchanges, and custodians. The platform secures over $110 billion in digital assets for 400+ institutions.

Services span node infrastructure on 70+ networks, staking on 50+ protocols, MPC custody via Builder Vault, and DeFi APIs from expand.network. Compliance includes ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, with non-custodial architecture that keeps clients in control of their keys.

Pros

• Builder Vault provides MPC custody for institutional key management
• Earn Stack combines staking on 50+ protocols with DeFi access in one integration
• expand.network unifies DeFi APIs across 40+ chains, providing one integration for DEX, bridge, and lending access

Cons

• No self-serve sign-up; access is sales-led
• Clients handle their own withdrawal flows and key recovery

Best for

Banks, custodians, and fintechs that need audited node, staking, custody, and DeFi infrastructure under one regulated vendor.

#9. Figment

Figment provides institutional staking infrastructure with $18 billion in assets under management across 40+ proof-of-stake networks. The platform powers staking for ETF and ETP issuers, including Grayscale, 21Shares, and 3iQ, alongside asset managers and custodians who need audited rewards reporting. Figment was the first entity in North America and Europe to achieve Full NORS Certification for Ethereum staking.

Pros

• Runs Rakurai on primary Solana validator, delivering higher per-epoch staking rewards
• Powers Coinbase Prime institutional staking across 12+ networks
• Genesis validator on Ethereum and Solana, with multi-client Ethereum operations

Cons

• Built around staking; no general RPC, indexing, or developer infrastructure beyond staking APIs
• Heavy concentration in Ethereum and Solana staking; other PoS networks get less depth

Best for

ETF and ETP issuers, asset managers, and custodians that need reporting-grade staking on Ethereum, Solana, and 40+ other proof-of-stake networks.

#10. Moralis

Moralis provides decoded Web3 data APIs across 50+ chains, returning parsed wallet, token, NFT, and DeFi data through a unified schema. The platform powers wallets and portfolio products, including MetaMask, Ledger, and Trust Wallet, with a real-time Streams API for backend event delivery. The Cortex API and open-source MCP Server let LLMs and AI agents query onchain data through natural language.

Pros

• Streams API guarantees 100% event delivery with automatic retries and replayable payloads
• Unified schema covers EVM, Solana, Bitcoin, and Stellar through a single API
• Open-source MCP Server is self-hostable for AI agent integration

Cons

• No self-hosted node option for teams that need to run their own infrastructure
• Some Solana features fall outside the cross-chain abstraction, requiring dedicated Solana Data API calls

Best for

Developer and product teams building wallets, portfolio trackers, and analytics tools that need decoded multi-chain data without operating their own indexing infrastructure.

#Conclusion

Choosing among these 10 Web3 infrastructure providers comes down to what you’re building and how much of the stack you want to manage.

Multi-chain dApps usually fit a single managed RPC provider. For chain-specialist apps, chain-native infrastructure often runs faster. Institutional teams need audited compliance and non-custodial architecture. Self-hosting validators on bare metal gives operators full control with crypto-native billing.

If you’re starting on Solana and want to self-host validators or RPC nodes, Cherry Servers offers bare metal Solana hosting with DoubleZero integration in EU regions and crypto-native billing.